|
Study on AMS
Effectiveness > Synergie AMS >
Products & Systems > Home
Study Results: The Effectiveness of Synergie AMS™
Treatments in Reducing the Appearance of Cellulite
Robert L. Youngblood, M.D.
James E. Pickens, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Background and Purpose
Vacuum massage devices are currently used to deliver
massage treatments for aesthetic improvement in the
superficial fat layer of the skin. This study of 48
female subjects was designed to measure and document the
effects of vacuum massage treatments with the Synergie
AMS™ device. The purpose of this study was not only to
observe whether changes in the appearance of cellulite
may be derived, but also to measure whether and to what
degree areas treated may expect to experience a loss in
girth as a result of treatments. The study was also
intended to determine the effect of adding further
factors of exercise and nutritional supplements to the
Synergie AMS™ treatment regimen.
Method
To accommodate the purpose of the study, four
different criteria were established and applied to four
different groups of women. Groups were identified A, B,
C, and D.
- Group A received AMS treatments only.
- Group B received AMS treatments and took
nutritional supplements.
- Group C received AMS treatments and added an
exercise regimen.
- Group D received AMS treatments, took
nutritional supplements, and added an exercise
regimen.
To document results, subjects were measured and
photographed at the start of the study, at the midway
point, and at the end of the study. Each subject was
given a relative cellulite rating from 1 to 5, with 1
indicating no visible cellulite, and 5 indicating most
severe cellulite. At the end of the study, subjects were
asked to evaluate whether they had seen a reduction in
the appearance of cellulite.
Subjects
A group of volunteer female applicants was screened
for meeting essential criteria: age (20 to 50 years
old), weight (up to 40 pounds over ideal weight),
contraindications (did not have any of the conditions
listed by the manufacturer as contraindicated). A total
number of 48 participants was selected from the
applicants who met this criteria. During the term of the
study, participants were prohibited from taking any
dietary substances for weight loss purposes except the
nutritional supplements provided to Groups B and D in
conjunction with this study. Over the eight-week term of
the study, 12 participants discontinued their
participation due to pregnancy, illness, or inability or
unwillingness to comply with criteria: Thirty-six
participants completed the study including 11 from Group
A, 8 from Group B, 7 from Group C, and 10 from Group D.
Apparatus
The Synergie AMS™ device manufactured by Dynatronics
was used to deliver treatments to the study
participants. The device offers 10 vacuum settings and a
countdown timer. Two treatment head sizes were used.
Procedure
All participants in all four groups received a
30-minute AMS treatment twice a week for eight weeks,
for a total of 16 treatments. All participants were
instructed not to change their current eating habits, to
drink 6 to 8 (8-ounce) glasses of water daily and up to
3 liters of water on the day of their treatments, and
were prohibited from participating in a weight loss
program during the study or from taking any weight loss
supplements except those provided to their group (Groups
B and D) as a part of this study. In addition to these
instructions, participants in each group were given
specific rules and instructions for their respective
groups.
- Group A. No additional instructions or rules
applied to Group A.
- Group B. This group was required to take three
nutritional supplements three times daily. The
supplements, under the Synergie NSP™ brand name,
included Fat Metabolizer, CarbAid™ and MetaSlim™.
- Group C. This group was required to add a
moderate aerobic exercise regimen for 30 minutes 3
to 5 times a week.
- Group D. This group was required to take the
nutritional supplements described for Group B and
was required to add the exercise regimen described
for Group C.
Participants were provided with a daily log sheet to
record their individual performance. The log sheet was
reviewed by the AMS treatment technician at each
treatment appointment, and the participant's compliance
with the program was logged in the participant's file.
The AMS massage treatments were delivered primarily
to the thigh, hip, abdomen, and buttocks areas, and to
both right and left sides of the body. At the end of the
fourth week and at the end of the study, each
participant was again measured, and photographed. At the
end of the study, each participant was asked to state a
subjective opinion as to whether or not she had seen a
reduction in the appearance of cellulite.
Data Analysis
Data was compiled in a table with separate
tabulations for each of the four groups; A, B, C, and D.
Measurements for inches lost in the waist, hips, and
thighs were added together for a total of all inches
lost for each individual. Inches lost were averaged by
group.
Results
Of the 36 participants who completed the study, 100%
experienced a loss in girth. Table I shows the average
inches lost by group. Group A lost an average of 3.4
total inches in the areas measured. Group B lost an
average of 4.5 inches, Group C an average of 5.4 inches,
and Group D an average of 6.1 inches. Of all 36
participants, 91% reported a visible reduction in the
appearance of cellulite: 31 reported a visible reduction
in the appearance of cellulite, 3 reported no visible
reduction, and 2 did not report as they did not have
visible cellulite at the start of the study. Of the 3
who reported no visible reduction, one was a participant
in Group A, one in Group C, and one in Group D.
Table I. Average Inches Lost by
Group
|
|
Group |
Regimen Followed |
% Showing Improvement in
Cellulite |
Inches Lost |
|
Waist |
Hips |
Thighs |
Total |
|
A |
Treatments Only |
90 % |
1.1 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
3.4 |
|
B |
Treatments & Nutritional Supplements |
100 % |
1.2 |
2.6 |
0.6 |
4.5 |
|
C |
Treatments & Exercise |
86 % |
2.4 |
2.2 |
0.8 |
5.4 |
|
D |
Full Program |
89 % |
2 |
2.8 |
1.3 |
6.1 |
Conclusions
The reduction in the appearance of cellulite was
essentially the same across all four groups of
participants. Therefore, it is concluded that the AMS
treatments themselves were the single most important
factor resulting in reduction in the appearance of
cellulite.
Greater loss of inches was seen when factors of
exercise and nutritional supplements were added. The
greatest inch loss was seen in the group that added both
factors of nutritional supplements and exercise to the
AMS treatments. It is, therefore, concluded that a
complete program including Synergie AMS treatments,
exercise, and nutritional supplements will produce the
greatest possible results in inches lost.
|